Sadeghi, M; Mahmoudi, A and Deng, X (2023) Blockchain technology in construction organizations: Risk assessment using trapezoidal fuzzy ordinal priority approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(7), pp. 2767-2793. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: In the digital transformation era, the construction industry is not immune to unintended consequences and disruptions of distributed ledger technologies like blockchain. At the micro-level, construction organizations need an in-depth understanding of blockchain risks to take proactive strategies for being on the safe side. This study seeks to answer “What are the risks associated with blockchain technology from the firm-level perspective? And how can this disruptive technology overshadow the business objectives and impact organizational criteria?” Design/methodology/approach: The current research proposes a novel model for risk assessment based on the trapezoidal fuzzy ordinal priority approach (OPA-F) in the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) context. The proposed model handles uncertainties of experts' judgment around three primary parameters: the importance of organizational criteria, the impact of blockchain risks on criteria and the probability of risk occurrence. Findings: The case study shows that organizational “communication and information” is exposed to the most blockchain risk. On the contrary, blockchain has less to do with an organization's “corporate social responsibility.” Furthermore, effective blockchain risk management can bring about cost efficiency, quality and improved customer experience for this case study. In the end, the authors develop a conceptual blockchain risk management framework based on findings. Research limitations/implications: This study will broaden researchers' horizons regarding “blockchain in construction context” and “blockchain risk management.” Practical implications: Furthermore, executives looking for blockchain-based solutions can benefit from research findings and lessons learned from this case study before decision-making. Lastly, the risk assessment model based on trapezoidal OPA-F can be used both for research purposes and industrial decision problems. Originality/value: To the best of the authors' knowledge, it is for the first time that the OPA-F is employed in a risk assessment model. Also, the original OPA-F is extended to trapezoidal OPA-F using trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, and it is the first attempt to evaluate blockchain risks facing construction organizations and develop a blockchain risk management framework accordingly.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | blockchain technology; construction organizations; distributed ledger technology; fuzzy ordinal priority approach; multi-criteria decision-making; risk assessment |
| Index terms: | transformation, case study, judgment, construction organization, blockchain, construction industry, corporate social responsibility, executive, risk management, risk assessment, strategy, multi-criteria decision-making, unintended consequence, cost efficiency, lessons learned, methodology, decision-making |
| Subjects: | dispute resolution, computing systems, practitioner, business, organization, data collection methods, risk assessment, professional development, financial risk, health safety and environment, research methods, economics, management, industry analysis, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Legal Issues, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here