Umeokafor, N; Windapo, A O; Manu, P; Diugwu, I and Haroglu, H (2023) Critical barriers to prevention through design in construction in developing countries: A qualitative inquiry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(7), pp. 3014-3042. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Given the complexities in improving safety in the construction industry globally, which is exacerbated by the complex safety environment in developing countries (DCs), prevention through design (PtD) has been established to improve occupational safety and health (OSH) where applied. However, it has received very little attention in DCs and the extant literature with limitations. Using Nigeria as a case study, the current study advances the understanding of PtD in DCs by investigating the critical barriers to PtD and other potential OSH responsibilities of designers in the construction industry. Design/methodology/approach: Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews and e-interviews of architects, builders and civil engineers in Nigeria were analysed using the six-phase thematic analysis. To improve the trustworthiness of the research, triangulation, peer-debriefing, refining the interview protocol and thick detailed description were done. Findings: The study's findings question the extant general knowledge and understanding of PtD among clients and designers and its technical aspect among designers where it is skewed to structural safety and omitted in universities' curricula. This explains the inconclusive findings of existing studies on why there is a high level of awareness of PtD but a low level of implementation. There is little client support for PtD, and designers have limited influence on clients in terms of it. The fear of liability from PtD is exacerbated by the limited legal system and lack of adequate legislation in the country. The demotivating attitudes of clients and contractors towards designers in terms of PtD are also reported, just as there are project delivery barriers such as traditional procurement not supporting PtD as design and build procurement does. Social implications: For the sustainable growth in the practice of PtD, the increased and improved quality of education and awareness of PtD is needed but this must focus on instilling a robust understanding of it among designers based on the local context. This educational requirement can be supported by statute. Originality/value: Through qualitative data, the findings explain and offer insight into the inconclusive findings in the extant studies on PtD in Nigeria. Also, it contributes to improving health and safety by advancing the understanding of the critical barriers to PtD and other potential OSH responsibilities of designers in D Nigeria's construction using qualitative data.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architecture; design for safety; emerging and developing countries; engineering and construction industry; risk control; safety in design |
| Index terms: | project delivery, implementation, construction industry, prevention, occupational safety and health, architect, traditional procurement, Nigeria, designer, low level, case study, triangulation, complexity, design and build, thematic analysis, statute, design for safety, methodology, builder, civil engineer, health and safety, liability, interview, developing country, legislation |
| Subjects: | practitioner, profession, data collection methods, research design and methodology, contractual arrangements, legal systems, project delivery, health safety and environment, methods and analysis, Geography, financial risk, development economics, research methods, industry analysis, systems engineering, liability law, occupational health and safety management, measurement and scaling |
| Topics: | International Construction, Legal Issues, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here