Wang, G; Locatelli, G; Zhang, H; Wan, J and Chen, Y (2023) Playing the cards right: Exploring the way leadership influences organizational citizenship behavior for the environment in megaprojects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(2), pp. 623-646. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Organizational citizenship behaviors for the environment (OCBEs) represent a crucial element of environmental sustainability for a wide range of organizations. However, the leadership mechanisms underlying OCBEs are as yet unexplored, particularly regarding the delivering megaprojects. The paper aims to investigate how transformational leadership (TFL) and transactional leadership (TSL) styles shape the environmental commitment (EC) of subordinates, motivating OCBEs in megaprojects. Design/methodology/approach: Partial least squares modeling and hierarchical regression were performed on data obtained from 140 experts who have been involved in megaprojects. Findings: Both TFL and TSL styles are effective in motivating OCBEs, although the EC of subordinates partially mediates these relationships. The power distance (PD) orientation significantly moderates the relationship between TFL and OCBEs, with the relationship being more positive when the PD of subordinates is lower. Unexpectedly, a collectivist orientation (CO) was found to elevate the effect of TSL but weaken the effect of TFL. Originality/value: The mixed and contradictory findings regarding TFL and TSL styles are reconciled in the current study by integrating the contextual factors of PD and CO. The findings of the study shed new light on “playing the cards right” when using the leadership practices, i.e. how leadership can be better leveraged to cultivate subordinates' OCBEs. They also provide targeted guidance for shaping contextual factors to increase the environmental sustainability of megaprojects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collectivism; environmental commitment; leadership; megaproject; organizational citizenship behaviors for the environment; power distance |
| Index terms: | partial least square, megaproject, environmental sustainability, methodology, commitment, modelling, transformational leadership |
| Subjects: | psychology, analytical methods, strategic project management, statistical analysis, management, research methods, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here