Pearl, R G; Bowen, P A and Nkado, R N (1997) A communication-based examination of construction planning and tendering. In: Stephenson, P (ed.) Proceedings of 13th Annual ARCOM Conference, 15-17 September 1997, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
The traditional separation of the design and construction phases of the traditional building procurement process, itself a barrier to effective communication and data transfer between the various role players, invariably means the delayed involvement of the contractor in the decision-making process. Thus, the expertise necessary to assess the construction implications of design decisions is effectively excluded from the pre-tender phase. The introduction of contractor's expertise regarding construction planning methods and the cost implications of design into price / cost and time forecasting models is therefore seen by some as having the potential for improving not only the basis upon which the prediction of building price / cost and time is established, but the quality of the tendering process as well. In contrast to the material available on the price forecasting procedures employed by professional quantity surveyors in South Africa, little or no evidence exists of an understanding of the contractor's tendering process, an appreciation of the extent to which construction planning techniques are formally incorporated in the tendering process, and the degree to which the practice of contractors' cost estimating follows the doctrines laid down in current theoretical textbooks. This paper presents the findings of an empirical study of the process by which contractors compile a tender bid, based on a national questionnaire survey of building contractors in South Africa.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction planning; tendering; bidding; contractors; communication |
| Index terms: | evidence, questionnaire, design and construction, empirical study, bidding, construction planning, design decision, South Africa, cost estimating, building contractor, forecasting, tendering process, traditional building procurement, quantity surveying, survey, decision-making process |
| Subjects: | research methods, tendering, design practice, Geography, decision analysis, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, profession, practitioner, financial and cost management, construction planning, prediction and forecasting, bidding, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Site Management, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Procurement, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here