Complex network-based research on organization collaboration and cooperation governance responding to COVID-19

Yang, L; Lou, J; Zhou, J; Zhao, X and Jiang, Z (2023) Complex network-based research on organization collaboration and cooperation governance responding to COVID-19. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(8), pp. 3749-3779. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: With multiple-related organizations, worldwide infections, deep economic recession and public disorder, and large consumption amount of anti-epidemic resources, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been defined as a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC). Nowadays, Wuhan has recovered from the pandemic disaster and reentered normalization. The purposes of this study are to (1) summarize organization collaboration patterns, successful experience and latent defects under across-stage evolution of Wuhan's cooperation governance mode against the pandemic, and on the basis, (2) reveal how the COVID-19 development trends and organizations' collaborative behaviors affected each other. Design/methodology/approach: Detailed content analysis of online news reports covering COVID-19 prevention and control measures on the website of Wuhan Municipal Government was adopted to identify organizations and their mutual collaborative interrelationships. Four complex network (CN) models of organization collaboration representing the outbreak, preliminary control, recession and normalization stages, respectively, were established then. Time-span-based dynamic parameter analyses of the proposed networks, comprising network cohesiveness analysis and node centrality analysis, were undertaken to indicate changes of global and local characteristics in networks. Findings: First, the definite collaborative status of Wuhan Headquarters for Pandemic Prevention and Control (WHPPC) has persisted throughout the period. Medical institutions and some other administrations were the most crucial participants collaborating with the WHPPC. Construction-industry organizations altered pandemic development trends twice to make the situation controllable. Media, large-scale enterprises, etc. set about underscoring themselves contributions since the third stage. Grassroots cadres and healthcare force, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), financial institutions, etc. were essential collaborated objects. Second, four evolution mechanisms of organization collaboration responding to the COVID-19 in Wuhan has been proposed. Research limitations/implications: First, universality of Wuhan-style governance experience may be affected. Second, the stage-dividing process may not be the most appropriate. Then, data source was single and link characteristics were not considered when modeling. Practical implications: This study may offer beneficial action guidelines to governmental agencies, the society force, media, construction-industry organizations and the market in other countries or regions suffering from COVID-19. Other organizations involved could also learn from the concluded organizations' contributions and four evolution mechanisms to find improvement directions. Originality/value: This study adds to the current theoretical knowledge body by verifying the feasibility and effectiveness of investigating cooperation governance in public emergencies from the perspectives of analyzing the across-stage organization collaboration CNs.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: complex network; cooperation governance; COVID-19 pandemic; organization collaboration
Index terms: municipal government, modelling, public health, content analysis, coronavirus, agency, governance, COVID-19, society, consumption, evolution, outbreak, effectiveness, media, pandemic, recession, cooperation, prevention, methodology, collaboration
Subjects: business, psychology, communities and social development, management, environmental health, performance management, financial risk, health conditions and diseases, consumer economics, health risk and incident analysis, data analysis and analytics, administrative law, research methods, economic analysis, sociology, analytical methods, environmental science
Topics: Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Governance, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Health and Safety, Legal Issues, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here