Zheng, J; Gu, Y; Zhang, Z; Xie, H; Li, P and Li, H (2023) The relationship between empowering leadership and project performance: A resource perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(7), pp. 2969-2990. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: While existing literature emphasizes the importance of empowerment in construction projects, the working mechanisms of empowering leadership in the project context are unclear. Based on conservation of resources (COR) theory, this study aimed to examine the relationship between empowering leadership and project performance, highlighting the mediation roles of creative self-efficacy and leadermember exchange and the moderation role of perceived overqualification. Design/methodology/approach: The authors collected data from 287 project members in different projects and tested the integrated conceptual model through moderated mediation analysis with bootstrapping strategy. Findings: The results revealed that empowering leadership was positively related to project performance through creative self-efficacy and leader–member exchange. Perceived overqualification served as significant moderator. Originality/value: The findings contribute to the understanding of empowering leadership in projects by verifying and extending the resource acquisition and investment process in the project context. The results of this study also demonstrated that creative belief and social exchange facilitate the effectiveness of project members' task efforts and outcomes and that perceived overqualification might not exert a detrimental effect on project performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | conservation of resources theory; creative self-efficacy; empowering leadership; leader; member exchange; perceived overqualification; project performance |
| Index terms: | empowerment, mediation, strategy, construction project, methodology, integrated conceptual model, acquisition, project performance, effectiveness, self-efficacy, conservation |
| Subjects: | environmental policy, dispute resolution, human factors and perception, business, production management, project management theory and practice, professional development, management, performance management, research methods |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Human Resources, Quality Management, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here