Zwikael, O; Salmona, M; Meredith, J and Zarghami, S A (2023) Enhancing project stakeholder communication under insufficient knowledge of project management concepts. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(10), pp. 5007-5029. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Although the literature is clear on what comprises effective project stakeholder management, communication between key stakeholders and project managers is often ineffective. Research is silent on stakeholders' insufficient knowledge of project management terminology, which is a barrier for such effective communication. This paper aims to identify the project management concepts that key stakeholders should understand to improve effective communication. Design/methodology/approach: This paper employs a three-step research design. In the first step, based on threshold concept theory, the authors identify the key project management concepts through interviews with 20 project management practitioners, trainers and trainees. In the second step, the authors confirm the findings from the first step and identify effective approaches to enhance project stakeholders' communication through seven additional interviews with project stakeholders. In the third step, the authors construct a functional model of the research findings by employing a system-level modeling tool. Findings: This research identifies five project management threshold concepts (TC) that are challenging for project stakeholders to understand (1) project benefits, (2) the iron triangle, (3) the critical path, (4) uncertainty and (5) project leadership. Following these knowledge barriers, the paper proposes unique approaches to develop effective project stakeholder communication. Originality/value: This paper advances project stakeholder management research by identifying knowledge barriers and providing project managers with more effective approaches to better engage with their stakeholders.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | project management; stakeholder communication; stakeholder management |
| Index terms: | modelling, stakeholder communication, project management, research design, project manager, stakeholder management, methodology, practitioner, project stakeholder, critical path, interview, management research |
| Subjects: | operations research, participation process, analytical methods, data collection methods, profession, research design and methodology, practitioner, sociology, research methods, professional development, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Time Control, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here