People, space use and objects: an UWB-based quantifying approach for post-occupancy evaluation of new architectural spaces

Ege, D N; Aalto, P and Steinert, M (2024) People, space use and objects: an UWB-based quantifying approach for post-occupancy evaluation of new architectural spaces. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(13), pp. 271-284. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to address the methodical shortcomings and high associated cost of understanding the use of new, poorly understood architectural spaces, such as makerspaces. The proposed quantified method of enhancing current post-occupancy evaluation (POE) practices aims to provide architects, engineers and building professionals with accessible and intuitive data that can be used to conduct comparative studies of spatial changes, understand changes over time (such as those resulting from COVID-19) and verify design intentions after construction through a quantified post-occupancy evaluation. Design/methodology/approach: In this study, we demonstrate the use of ultra-wideband (UWB) technology to gather, analyze and visualize quantified data showing interactions between people, spaces and objects. The experiment was conducted in a makerspace over a four-day hackathon event with a team of four actively tracked participants. Findings: The study shows that by moving beyond simply counting people in a space, a more nuanced pattern of interactions can be discovered, documented and analyzed. The ability to automatically visualize findings intuitively in 3D aids architects and visual thinkers to easily grasp the essence of interactions with minimal effort. Originality/value: By providing a method for better understanding the spatial and temporal interactions between people, objects and spaces, our approach provides valuable feedback in POE. Specifically, our approach aids practitioners in comparing spaces, verifying design intent and speeding up knowledge building when developing new architectural spaces, such as makerspaces.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architectural quality; indoor location; interactions; post occupancy evaluation; ultra-wideband technology; experiment
Index terms: practitioner, methodology, experiment, COVID-19, architectural quality, interaction, architect, comparative study, building professional, ultra-wideband, engineer, post-occupancy evaluation
Subjects: research design and methodology, data collection methods, profession, practitioner, evaluation methods, research methods, health risk and incident analysis, networking, behavioral psychology, quality assurance
Topics: Quality Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here