Jafary, P; Shojaei, D; Rajabifard, A and Ngo, T (2024) BIM and real estate valuation: Challenges, potentials and lessons for future directions. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(4), pp. 1642-1677. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Building information modeling (BIM) is a striking development in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry, which provides in-depth information on different stages of the building lifecycle. Real estate valuation, as a fully interconnected field with the AEC industry, can benefit from 3D technical achievements in BIM technologies. Some studies have attempted to use BIM for real estate valuation procedures. However, there is still a limited understanding of appropriate mechanisms to utilize BIM for valuation purposes and the consequent impact that BIM can have on decreasing the existing uncertainties in the valuation methods. Therefore, the paper aims to analyze the literature on BIM for real estate valuation practices. Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents a systematic review to analyze existing utilizations of BIM for real estate valuation practices, discovers the challenges, limitations and gaps of the current applications and presents potential domains for future investigations. Research was conducted on the Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar databases to find relevant references that could contribute to the study. A total of 52 publications including journal papers, conference papers and proceedings, book chapters and PhD and master's theses were identified and thoroughly reviewed. There was no limitation on the starting date of research, but the end date was May 2022. Findings: Four domains of application have been identified: (1) developing machine learning-based valuation models using the variables that could directly be captured through BIM and industry foundation classes (IFC) data instances of building objects and their attributes; (2) evaluating the capacity of 3D factors extractable from BIM and 3D GIS in increasing the accuracy of existing valuation models; (3) employing BIM for accurate estimation of components of cost approach-based valuation practices; and (4) extraction of useful visual features for real estate valuation from BIM representations instead of 2D images through deep learning and computer vision. Originality/value: This paper contributes to research efforts on utilization of 3D modeling in real estate valuation practices. In this regard, this paper presents a broad overview of the current applications of BIM for valuation procedures and provides potential ways forward for future investigations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial intelligence; building information modeling; machine learning; real estate valuation; three-dimensional data |
| Index terms: | science, real estate, computer vision, conference, investigation, lifecycle, artificial intelligence, database, accuracy, industry foundation classes, deep learning, methodology, estimation, systematic literature review, valuation method, journal, building information modelling, machine learning, publication, 3D modelling |
| Subjects: | computer vision, research evaluation and metrics, research dissemination and communication, financial and cost management, artificial intelligence, real estate economics, computational design, data management, professional development, information systems, research methods, specialized education, data collection methods, project delivery |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Education, Digital Applications, Project Management, Research Practice, Urban Studies, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here