Idoro, G (2009) Evaluating levels of project planning and their effects on performance in the Nigerian construction industry. Construction Economics and Building, 9(2), pp. 39-50. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
This study compares the level of project planning on public andprivate sectors projects and its impact on performance. Thepurpose is to create awareness of the level and effectivenessof the planning done by public and private clients in the deliveryof construction projects. A questionnaire survey administeredto a sample of 130 client representatives selected by stratifi edrandom sampling from the population of public and private clientsin the Nigerian construction industry is used and analysed usingdescriptive statistics, the t-test and Spearman correlation test. Theresults show that the level of preconstruction planning on privatesector projects is higher than that of public sector projects whilethe level of contract planning done by the latter is higher thanthat of the former. Furthermore, the performance of private sectorprojects is higher than that of public sector projects in many of theparameters used. However, the level of preparation of life-cyclecharts that concern project delivery time in both public and privatesectors projects is low and the level of project planning in the twocategories of projects has a limited impact on project performance.The understanding of how public and private sectors projectsperform in planning and its impact are expected to assist publicand private clients to know the challenges ahead of them in theireffort to improve the planning and performance of their projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Nigeria; client type; construction industry; project performance; project planning |
| Index terms: | construction industry, statistics, private sector, survey, project delivery, project planning, public sector, Nigeria, construction project, population, questionnaire, project performance, sampling |
| Subjects: | control systems, project management theory and practice, Geography, production management, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, project delivery, industry analysis, administrative law, demography |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Business Strategy, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here