Nguyen, M V (2024) Barriers to corporate social responsibility performance in construction organizations. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(4), pp. 1473-1496. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to identify and prioritize barriers to corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the construction sector. Design/methodology/approach: A literature review was first conducted to identify barriers to CSR performance. After that, construction professionals were invited to validate the appropriateness of the obstacles. The discussion allowed the establishment of a list of barriers to CSR performance and their corresponding categories. Data collected from the survey were then analyzed to prioritize the importance of these barriers by the fuzzy DEMATEL-based ANP (DANP) technique. Findings: The findings presented 16 barriers to CSR, which were categorized into four clusters. The fuzzy DANP analysis showed that strategic vision is the most crucial cluster, followed by the measurement system, stakeholder perspective and scarce resources. Among the sixteen barriers examined, lack of awareness, knowledge and information of CSR; low priority of CSR; lack of metrics to quantify CSR benefits; lack of guidelines and coherent strategies; and lack of CSR enforcement mechanism are the five most crucial barriers. Originality/value: This study is one of the first that proposes a comprehensive model to prioritize barriers to CSR performance of contractors considering their interrelationships. It provides construction stakeholders with a framework for understanding the linkage between the barriers and CSR framework under the umbrella of stakeholder theory. Thus, the findings might assist construction practitioners and academics in fostering the success of CSR implementation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | barrier; construction; corporate social responsibility; fuzzy DEMATEL |
| Index terms: | literature review, strategy, construction practitioner, survey, methodology, construction sector, construction organization, linkage, construction professional, enforcement, corporate social responsibility, implementation |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, business, organization, data collection methods, industry analysis, professional development, health safety and environment, research methods, management |
| Topics: | Procurement, Information Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here