BIM in the Malaysian construction industry: A scientometric review and case study

Tanko, B L; Zakka, W P and Heng, W N (2024) BIM in the Malaysian construction industry: A scientometric review and case study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(3), pp. 1165-1186. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore existing literature on Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia and examine the perception of practitioners about the potential of BIM applications in reducing construction waste and enhancing productivity. Design/methodology/approach: First, using 244 bibliographic data extracted from the Scopus database, the paper used scientometric analysis and VOSviewer mapping technique to assess the most impactful publication literature on BIM in Malaysia to identify the existing research gaps. Second, using a structured questionnaire, a total of 100 questionnaires were distributed to practising practitioners who incorporate BIM in the delivery of their projects. Descriptive analysis using cross-tabulation in SPSS software, radar chart, relative importance index and Pearson’s correlation were used to analyze the data. Findings: The research gaps are in the fields of construction projects, buildings, energy efficiency, lifecycle and housing. The findings of the survey indicate that quantity take-off, clash detection, site utilization planning, digital fabrication as well as 4D stimulation were the main BIM applications used among the practitioners in Johor and Selangor. Practical implications: By assessing the state-of-the-art of BIM and BIM applications in this region, the practical implications of this study provide useful insights to construction stakeholders, funding organizations, policymakers, research institutions, professionals, journal editors, reviewers and researchers to understand the overall trend of BIM in Malaysia and its usage. Originality/value: This paper is the first to use science mapping using scientometrics to reveal the current BIM research in “Malaysia only”. Relying on the identified gaps, the study further examined the usage of BIM applications in Malaysian construction projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: BIM; case study; construction; productivity
Index terms: building information modelling, energy efficiency, research institution, Malaysia, case study, productivity, database, funding, lifecycle, construction industry, scientometrics, construction waste, take-off, relative importance index, science, survey, digital fabrication, journal, mapping, methodology, construction project, practitioner, state of the art, questionnaire, publication, housing
Subjects: research methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, management, quantity surveying, production management, Geography, research management, data management, research evaluation and metrics, information systems, industry analysis, research dissemination and communication, data collection methods, risk assessment, construction type, practitioner, waste management, specialized education, sustainability and energy, project delivery, economic analysis
Topics: Information Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Education
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here