Walking the talk towards sustainable consumption: Interventions to promote the uptake of reprocessed construction materials

Tennakoon, G A; Rameezdeen, R and Chileshe, N (2024) Walking the talk towards sustainable consumption: Interventions to promote the uptake of reprocessed construction materials. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(7), pp. 2878-2899. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The uptake of reprocessed construction materials (RCMs) derived from demolition waste (DW) is limited, which questions the long-term sustainability of DW reverse logistics (RL). To address this gap, the current study focused on identifying informational and structural interventions to promote the uptake of RCMs among Australian construction professionals (CPs). Design/methodology/approach: Following a qualitative research approach with thirty-one semi-structured interviews, the study explored potential interventions that can drive broader RCM usage. The study's strength lies in the in-depth qualitative insights gathered through extensive interviews with CPs experienced in using RCMs. Findings: Sixteen informational and structural interventions to promote the uptake of RCMs were identified and mapped against the industry levels at which they should be implemented. RCM suppliers should focus on improving material quality, supply and marketing while minimising material costs. Governments should encourage using RCMs through incentivisation, supportive legislation and approval processes. The significance of awareness building and research was also recognised, which requires the collective efforts of suppliers, governmental and non-governmental bodies and educational institutes. Originality/value: Despite the talk around sustainable consumption, the actual walk towards this is limited from a construction perspective, as seen through the low uptake of RCMs. This study attempts to bridge this mismatch by outlining informational and structural interventions that would drive CPs to walk the talk and use RCMs for construction applications. While most studies on DW RL have focused on improving waste recovery processes, this study takes a less-trodden path and explores the potential for developing markets for RCMs.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Australia; demolition waste; informational interventions; market; qualitative research; reprocessed construction materials; reverse logistics; structural interventions; sustainable consumption
Index terms: interview, approval, legislation, incentivization, consumption, demolition waste, qualitative research, methodology, Australia, recovery, reverse logistics, mismatch, markets, marketing, construction professional, construction material
Subjects: research methods, supply chain operations, professional development, Geography, research design and methodology, business, contractual role, engineering problems, risk assessment, data collection methods, consumer economics, waste management, building materials, operations management, economic analysis, legal systems
Topics: Supply Chain Management, Legal Issues, Contract Administration, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here