Impact of supervisor leadership on construction worker safety behavior in China: The moderating role of social capital

Wu, X; Qian, Q and Zhang, M (2024) Impact of supervisor leadership on construction worker safety behavior in China: The moderating role of social capital. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(5), pp. 1947-1972. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Leaders' behavior has a critical impact on workers' safety behavior. However, previous studies have shown contradictive views on the effect of different leadership styles on safety behavior. One reason may be that the effectiveness of leaders' behavior varies according to diverse contexts. This study examines the effect of transformational and transactional leadership (TsL) on the safety behavior of on-site workers under different levels of social capital in construction projects. Design/methodology/approach: Safety behavior is divided into three types: safety compliance (SC), organizational-oriented safety participation and individual-oriented safety participation (ISP). Questionnaire survey data were collected from 302 construction workers in the Chinese construction industry. Findings: The results indicate that the positive effect of transformational leadership (TfL) of frontline supervisors on the two types of construction workers' safety participation is enhanced when social capital is high, although TfL has no significant effect on SC behavior. In contrast, TsL can promote construction workers' SC behavior and organizational-oriented safety participation and social capital positively moderating these relationships. TsL has no significant effect on ISP, but its interaction with safety behavior is positively related to ISP. Research limitations/implications: This study explains the inconsistent findings of previous research related to the role of leadership in safety behavior by introducing the social capitaltheory and distinguishing safety participation into two typesThis study is confined to one specific country, future research may benefit from investigating whether the conclusions of this study will be different in other nations with diverse cultures. Practical implications: The findings of the study provide frontline supervisors with new insights into improving workers' safety and the efficiency of leadership in safety management. Originality/value: This study explains the inconsistent findings of previous research related to the role of leadership in safety behavior by introducing the social capital theory and distinguishing safety participation into two types.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction project; moderating effect; safety behavior; social capital; supervisor leadership
Index terms: effectiveness, interaction, construction industry, supervisor, construction worker, transformational leadership, efficiency, safety behaviour, methodology, construction project, questionnaire, China, safety management, compliance, survey, social capital, leadership style
Subjects: sociology, occupational health and safety management, behavioral psychology, industry analysis, leadership, performance management, research methods, management, Geography, health safety and environment, production management, data collection methods, practitioner
Topics: Quality Management, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here