Critical success factors for the implementation of urban regeneration reits in China: A tism–MICMAC based approach

Xiahou, X; Li, Z; Zuo, J; Wang, Z; Li, K and Li, Q (2024) Critical success factors for the implementation of urban regeneration reits in China: A tism–MICMAC based approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(1), pp. 363-385. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Real estate investment trusts (REITs) have shown great potential in addressing the current contradiction between underinvestment and sustainable development of urban regeneration in China, as well as in further facilitating the transformation and upgrading of China's urban development. In this regard, this study aims to investigate critical success factors (CSFs) and explore the relationships among these factors, and serve as a reference to provide recommendations and strategies for the successful implementation and sustainable development of urban regeneration REITs. Design/methodology/approach: In this study, an integrated total interpretive structural modeling–matriced impact croises multiplication applique (TISM–MICMAC) approach using the TISM technique and MICMAC analysis is then implemented to explore the relationships among CSFs, demonstrate the hierarchical structure and classify these factors into clusters based on calculated driving powers and dependence. Findings: This study has determined a final list of 11 CSFs through literature review and expert survey. The TISM model demonstrates a six-level hierarchical structure encompassing the influence transmission paths of CSFs, in which the most significant factors and links are established, while the MICMAC analysis further classifies CSFs into four clusters as a complement for the findings of the TISM technique. Practical implications: This study offers practical implications for governments, individual and institutional investors, REITs and property managers, and other stakeholders concluded in urban regeneration REITs. The final list of determined CSFs can serve as the decision points for management and control of the implementation processes, while the findings of the TISM–MICMAC approach can be a significant reference to provide strategies for optimization and enhancement of urban regeneration REITs. Originality/value: This study is a novel attempt to use both the TISM technique and MICMAC analysis to investigate CSFs for the implementation of urban regeneration REITs, and to address the theoretical and methodological research gaps in the existing literature.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: critical success factors; MICMAC analysis; sustainable urban development; total interpretive structural modeling; urban regeneration reits
Index terms: methodology, underinvestment, critical success factor, China, urban regeneration, manager, survey, real estate investment, upgrading, sustainable development, strategy, literature review, urban development, implementation, interpretive structural modelling, investor, sustainable urban development, transformation
Subjects: sustainability and resilience, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, business, data collection methods, strategic management, control systems, practitioner, sociology, research methods, post-disaster and reconstruction, management, urban design, Geography, health safety and environment
Topics: Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here