Benhaim, M and Birchall, D W (1998) Interfirm relationships within the construction industry: A comparative study between France and the UK. In: Hughes, W (ed.) Proceedings of 14th Annual ARCOM Conference, 9-11 September 1998, Reading, UK.
Abstract
Interfirm relationships in the Construction Industry, studied in France and in the UK, are undergoing major changes. These changes are analysed using a framework based on human ecology/collective-action theory. A historical overview of the Industry in both countries reveals similarities in their national evolution. The Industry's fragmentation has created vicious circles in the production system that has, in turn, damaged production conditions. The latest organizational form to emerge, partnering, adopted by isolated French construction companies in the 80s and by a few pioneers in the UK since 1994, provides the basis for an overall reassessment of the relationships between clients, designers, engineers, main contractors and subcontractors. Case studies have been used to explore the determinants of partnering implementation or, in the case of the French study, the reasons for its failure. On the basis of these findings, the collective-action theory is shown to offer a framework for better understanding the UK and French Industry's situation and the reasons for network occurrence in the UK, as an alternative to the merchanting system.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | co-operation; interfirm relationships; partnering; networks |
| Index terms: | interfirm relationship, comparative study, evolution, subcontractor, construction industry, determinant, implementation, case study, production system, partnering, main contractor, France, designer, ecology, construction company, engineer, fragmentation |
| Subjects: | Geography, manufacturing engineering, industry analysis, partnership management, practitioner, profession, risk assessment, data collection methods, research design and methodology, organization, business, contractual arrangements, environmental science |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Procurement, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here