You, Z (2024) Intelligent construction: Unlocking opportunities for the digital transformation of China's construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(4), pp. 1429-1453. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The existing literature has been mainly focused on local problems but without an overall framework for studying the top-level planning of intelligent construction from a systematic perspective. The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap. Design/methodology/approach: This research adopts a deductive research approach. Findings: This research proposes a reference architecture and related business scenario framework for intelligent construction based on the existing theory and industrial practice. Originality/value: The main contribution of this research is to provide a useful reference to the Chinese government and industry for formulating digital transformation strategies, as well as suggests meaningful future research directions in the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | business scenario; digital transformation; intelligent construction; reference architecture |
| Index terms: | construction industry, transformation, China, methodology, strategy |
| Subjects: | management, research methods, Geography, industry analysis, business |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here