Aiming for bullseye: A novel gameplan for circular economy in the construction industry

Zandee, D; Zutshi, A; Creed, A and Nijhof, A (2024) Aiming for bullseye: A novel gameplan for circular economy in the construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(2), pp. 593-617. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The paper aims to provide managerial recommendations for implementing circular economy (CE) principles in both organizational and interorganizational contexts, including when using digital tools, such as building information modeling (BIM) and blockchain. Drawn from the construction sector in the Netherlands, the findings can be generalized to similar sectors where a company may receive multiple inputs as part of its supply chain augmented by digital technologies. Design/methodology/approach: Design addresses the research question: what are the strategic and tactical approaches of organizations on the CE pathway? Sub-questions target initiatives pursued by participants, and look toward information, roles and functions for supporting the CE process. Applying a multiple-case study approach (21 semi-structured interviews with 29 participants) the paper explores strategic initiatives of construction companies implementing CE pathways. The strength of the research design comes from facilitation of rich and deep qualitative insights from Netherlands-based managers embedded within global supply chains contributing to conceptual mapping. A limitation is data from one country (though representing both national and multinational companies). Findings: Interviewed managers share guidance for production-related construction companies anchored in materials and product design. Recommendations include to (1) develop both internally and externally the awareness of CE amongst leaders, (2) communicate with internal and external stakeholders for shared vision across the supply chain, (3) start with pilot projects, and (4) ensure product data-integration for CE business models through computer modeling and blockchain for decision-making processes, choices of materials, business model coordination and product (re)design. Continuous learning about CE roles and responsibilities amidst organizational process restructuring is required throughout linear to CE transitions. Extending the time for the CE principles evaluation process would allow for reconsideration of decisions made for CE implemented projects. Originality/value: A novel CE gameplan with a hurdles and recommendations checklist provides an operational interface with decision making points between internal factors for the host organization and external supply chain partners.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bullseye; circular economy; construction; gameplan; supply chain; the Netherlands
Index terms: case study, interorganizational, computer modelling, building information modelling, circular economy, decision-making process, research design, business model, blockchain, coordination, construction industry, product design, manager, interview, construction company, Netherlands, methodology, decision-making, mapping, integration, construction sector, digital technology, external stakeholder
Subjects: sociology, decision analysis, organizational analysis, information systems, industry analysis, spatial and geospatial analysis, research methods, management, sustainable design, Geography, modelling and simulation, innovation and technology management, business, organization, research design and methodology, data collection methods, practitioner, computing systems
Topics: Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here