Modeling influence mechanism of factors on corporate social responsibility implementation: Evidence from Chinese construction firms

Zhang, Q; Oo, B L and Lim, B T H (2024) Modeling influence mechanism of factors on corporate social responsibility implementation: Evidence from Chinese construction firms. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(1), pp. 324-362. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The interest in corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become burgeoning in the construction industry as firms are under constant pressure from socially conscious stakeholders to demonstrate their efforts to address various CSR issues. This study aims to unveil the key practices and impact factors (KPIFs) of CSR implementation in construction firms and the interrelationships among different key impact factors toward attaining CSR practices. Design/methodology/approach: Mobilizing the integrated institutional, stakeholder and self-determination theories, a theoretical framework was first developed to elaborate the potential inter-relationships among the key impact factors toward CSR implementation. Data were collected from extra-grade contractors through an online questionnaire survey and was then analyzed by the partial least square structural equation modeling method. Findings: The results show that construction firms' CSR practices could be classified into eight distinct key dimensions, e.g. shareholders' interests, government commitment and environment preservation. It is found that three groups of key impact factors – external institutional factors (especially coercive-normative factors), intrinsic factors (especially strategic business direction and organizational culture) and identified factors (i.e. the perceived importance of CSR practices) – have statistically significant positive impacts on most key dimensions of CSR practices. Practical implications: The research findings have implications for top management to better understand CSR implementation, thereby helping them secure legitimacy to survive and advance in the competitive construction businesses. Originality/value: The findings contribute to the theoretical body of knowledge in CSR by modeling and empirically demonstrating the influence mechanism of CSR implementation in construction within an integrated model.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction firms; construction industry; corporate social responsibility; factors; PLS-SEM; practices; sustainable development
Index terms: partial least square, body of knowledge, legitimacy, organizational culture, methodology, top management, evidence, self-determination, questionnaire, sustainable development, commitment, structural equation modelling, construction firm, survey, construction industry, implementation, modelling, dimension, corporate social responsibility, integrated model
Subjects: sociology, statistical analysis, industry analysis, research methods, management, health safety and environment, psychology, analytical methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, knowledge management, contractual arrangements, organization, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, human factors and perception
Topics: Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Procurement, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here