Zhao, J; Cao, Y and Xiang, Y (2024) Pose estimation method for construction machine based on improved alphapose model. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(3), pp. 976-996. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The safety management of construction machines is of primary importance. Considering that traditional construction machine safety monitoring and evaluation methods cannot adapt to the complex construction environment, and the monitoring methods based on sensor equipment cost too much. This paper aims to introduce computer vision and deep learning technologies to propose the YOLOv5-FastPose (YFP) model to realize the pose estimation of construction machines by improving the AlphaPose human pose model. Design/methodology/approach: This model introduced the object detection module YOLOv5m to improve the recognition accuracy for detecting construction machines. Meanwhile, to better capture the pose characteristics, the FastPose network optimized feature extraction was introduced into the Single-Machine Pose Estimation Module (SMPE) of AlphaPose. This study used Alberta Construction Image Dataset (ACID) and Construction Equipment Poses Dataset (CEPD) to establish the dataset of object detection and pose estimation of construction machines through data augmentation technology and Labelme image annotation software for training and testing the YFP model. Findings: The experimental results show that the improved model YFP achieves an average normalization error (NE) of 12.94 × 10–3, an average Percentage of Correct Keypoints (PCK) of 98.48% and an average Area Under the PCK Curve (AUC) of 37.50 × 10–3. Compared with existing methods, this model has higher accuracy in the pose estimation of the construction machine. Originality/value: This study extends and optimizes the human pose estimation model AlphaPose to make it suitable for construction machines, improving the performance of pose estimation for construction machines.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction safety; construction site; estimating |
| Index terms: | methodology, dataset, construction safety, safety management, estimating, object detection, equipment cost, computer vision, construction site, accuracy, monitoring, module, testing, traditional construction, construction equipment, estimation, deep learning |
| Subjects: | professional practice, artificial intelligence, financial and cost management, work location, control systems, heritage and conservation, environmental health, occupational health and safety management, data management, computer vision, professional development, construction equipment, architectural elements, economics, research methods |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Plant and Equipment, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here