Brown, L A and Cresciani, M (2017) Adaptable design in olympic construction. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 35(4), pp. 397-416.
Abstract
Purpose The Olympic Games is the largest sporting mega event of its type, with deep cultural and historical roots. The event is short lived compared to the lifespan of the infrastructure required in host cities. The purpose of this paper is to examine models of adaptability in Olympic construction, using case studies in previous Olympic host cities of the Summer Olympic Games (Rome 1960, London 2012), to assess the impact of adaptability on future legacy. Design/methodology/approach A mixed methods approach (archival research, direct observation), was used in two case studies: Rome (Palazzetto dello Sport, Palazzo dello Sport), and London (London Olympic Velodrome, London Aquatics Centre). The case studies examined how adaptability was used in design to secure legacy. Findings In the selected case studies (Rome 1960, London 2012), adaptability has had a positive impact on the post-Games use of venues, all four of which remain in use today. However, there are multiple factors that contribute to post-Games legacy, and further research is necessary. Research limitations/implications Whilst some positive results were observed in this study, more research is necessary across a broader spectrum of sites and venues to make conclusive recommendations for architects designing for Mega Sporting events. Social implications The significance of this study to architectural practice, academia, and society is its potential to benefit future Olympic Games, International Olympic Committee policy, and be extended to other Mega Sporting events. Originality/value The originality of this research lies within its analysis of Olympic infrastructures and sustainability, of which there is a current lack of comparative studies in academic research.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | sustainability; olympic games; urban design; architectural design; building adaptability; post-games use |
| Index terms: | summer, architectural design, case study, lifespan, mixed method, building adaptability, Olympic Games, adaptability, methodology, comparative study, direct observation, London, architect, urban design, archival research, post-games use, architectural practice, society, academia, Rome |
| Subjects: | Geography, building performance, communities and social development, infrastructure and transport systems, design practice, climate science, business, urban design, user focus, educational institutions, data collection methods, profession, research design and methodology, sociology, research methods, material degradation and durability |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Education, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here