Nieboer, N (2017) Improving energy performance of Dutch homes: Coping with general investment behaviours. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 35(5), pp. 488-500.
Abstract
Purpose Recent findings from a monitor containing around 1.5 million homes in the Dutch non-profit rental sector show that the improvement of the energy performance of the respective homes is mostly carried out in small steps: single measures per dwelling dominate and deep energy renovations are rare. From the way in which housing providers conceive and implement their portfolio and asset management strategies, the purpose of this paper is to explain for the dominance of the small interventions and investigate the argument for a more concentrated allocation of budget resources. Design/methodology/approach In total, 12 housing providers with different energy investment policies were selected and interviewed. Findings Results show that energy investments, as most other investments, must fit in regular investment schemes and have to follow general decision criteria such as the lifespan of the respective building element and the market position of the respective dwelling. As these schemes are limited in budget and time, the room for a more concentrated allocation of budget resources is small. Research limitations/implications The number of organisations interviewed is obviously not statistically representative, but gives a good indication of the investment planning practice in the Dutch non-profit housing sector. Originality/value Much has been written about the (slow) progress of the energy performance in the housing sector, but not about the more structural organisational forces behind this progress.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Netherlands; housing; portfolio management; non-profit; energy performance; asset management |
| Index terms: | methodology, housing, lifespan, strategy, Netherlands, asset management, decision criteria, coping, energy performance, portfolio management, energy renovation, non-profit |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, material degradation and durability, energy systems, organization, construction type, decision analysis, asset management, behavioral psychology, research methods, renovation and retrofit, management, Geography |
| Topics: | Construction Materials, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here