Integrating BIM into facility management: Typology matrix of information handover requirements

Hosseini, M R; Roelvink, R; Papadonikolaki, E; Edwards, D J and Pärn, E (2018) Integrating BIM into facility management: Typology matrix of information handover requirements. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 36(1), pp. 2-14. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: Integrating building information modelling (BIM) into facility management (FM) has generated fervent debate within the extant literature given an increasing realisation amongst practitioners that the majority of BIM benefits reside within the whole lifecycle management. Converting a building’s in-use data and information into tangible business knowledge to augment FM performance is crucial for business growth and prosperity. Yet curiously, scant academic attention has been paid in investigating the data and information hand-over process through BIM required by FM. The purpose of this paper is to address this knowledge gap. Design/methodology/approach: The research approach adopted draws upon pertinent BIM in the FM literature and a qualitative discourse accrued via focus group meetings of Australian FM experts. Findings: The study’s findings are presented as a data and information typology matrix that captures the associations among different forms of data ownership, FM service delivery categories and data and information typologies for using BIM in FM. Practical implications: The analysis results will prove invaluable for policy-makers, researchers and practitioners by providing a relevant data and information typology and capturing the complex associations in the process of integrating BIM into FM. Originality/value: This study contributes to the field by providing a better understanding of different forms of data and information, required by members of a FM team. The original insight shared here is the necessity to consider a distinctive array of interests and the potential for using different forms of data and information when integrating BIM into FM.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modelling; facility management; information requirements; typology matrix
Index terms: building information modelling, business growth, service delivery, lifecycle, ownership, focus group, methodology, practitioner
Subjects: project delivery, strategic management, data collection methods, practitioner, information systems, economics, research methods, service delivery
Topics: Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here