Simpson, E; Bradley, D and O’Keeffe, J (2018) Failure is an option: An innovative engineering curriculum. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 36(3), pp. 268-282. ISSN 23984708
Abstract
Purpose: Advancements and innovation in engineering design are based on learning from previous failures but students are encouraged to “succeed” first time and hence can avoid learning from failure in practice. The purpose of this paper is to design and evaluate a curriculum to help engineering design students to learn from failure. Design/methodology/approach: A new curriculum design provided a case study for evaluating the effects of incorporating learning from failure within a civil engineering course. An analysis of the changes in course output was undertaken in relation to graduate destination data covering 2006 to 2016 and student satisfaction from 2012 to 2017 and a number of challenges and solutions for curriculum designers were identified. Findings: The design and delivery of an innovative curriculum, within typical constraints, can provide opportunities for students to develop resilience to failure as an integral part of their learning in order to think creatively and develop novel engineering solutions. The key issues identified were: the selection of appropriate teaching methods, creating an environment for exploratory learning, group and team assessments with competitive elements where practicable and providing students with many different pedagogical approaches to produce a quality learning experience. Originality/value: This case study demonstrates how to design and implement an innovative curriculum that can produce positive benefits of learning from failure. This model can be applied to other disciplines such as building surveying and construction management. This approach underpins the development of skills necessary in the educational experience to develop as a professional building pathologist.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | curriculum development; engineering design; failure; innovation; learning |
| Index terms: | case study, designer, engineering design, teaching method, learning experience, option, building surveying, methodology, student satisfaction, curriculum development |
| Subjects: | research methods, design process, professional development, teaching methods, decision analysis, professions and roles, profession, data collection methods, learning methods, curriculum development |
| Topics: | Education, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Research Practice, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here