Investigation of facilities management practices for providing feedback during the design development and review stages

Fatayer, F A; Hassanain, M A; Abdallah, A and Al-Hammad, A M (2019) Investigation of facilities management practices for providing feedback during the design development and review stages. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 37(5), pp. 597-614. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the current practices of the early facilities management (FM) involvement during the design development and review stages (DDRS), and recommend activities aimed at achieving better integration. Design/methodology/approach: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to ascertain the challenges faced by the integrated design team (IDT) in the absence of the facilities managers' review of design solutions, and underscore the significance of the early involvement of facilities managers during the DDRS. A questionnaire survey was then developed for collecting data on eight aspects of the current practices of early FM involvement during the DDRS. The questionnaire survey was administered to the FM departments of 13 long established, public universities in Saudi Arabia. Ten responses were obtained and analyzed. Findings: The findings suggest that the early involvement of the FM department enhances the operation and maintenance of facilities. This has been measured through reductions in the number of architectural, structural, electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilating and air conditioning defects. Practical implications: Recommendations were provided to facilitate the process of integrating the practices of two influential stakeholders of building projects. These recommendations encompass the need for maintainability considerations at the early schematic stage, the necessity of direct contact between the two parties and the necessity of facility managers' increased familiarity of the design stage activities, among other recommendations. In this way, the study promotes the awareness of the significance of integrating FM with the IDT at the DDRS. Originality/value: This study contributes to the literature and practice by presenting a detailed analysis of the integration process between the FM department and the IDT. Furthermore, the outcomes of the integration between the parties were measured to assess the effectiveness of the collaboration and highlight the possible areas of improvement.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: design phase; design team; facilities management; integration; maintenance feedback
Index terms: questionnaire, design stage, facilities manager, methodology, integration, collaboration, air conditioning, facilities management, maintainability, operation and maintenance, manager, survey, literature review, design team, design phase, effectiveness, investigation, plumbing, design development, public university, Saudi Arabia
Subjects: organizational analysis, educational institutions, environmental engineering, management, performance management, research methods, maintenance engineering, Geography, design process, data analysis and analytics, professional practice, data collection methods, mechanical systems, practitioner
Topics: Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Education, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here