The inherent building energy-cost relationship: An analysis of thirty Melbourne case studies

Langston, Y L and Langston, C (2009) The inherent building energy-cost relationship: An analysis of thirty Melbourne case studies. Construction Economics and Building, 9(1), pp. 9-18. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

This study investigates the energy and cost performance of thirtyrecent buildings in Melbourne, Australia. Commonly, buildingdesign decisions are based on issues pertaining to constructioncost, and consideration of energy performance is made onlywithin the context of the initial project budget. Even where energyis elevated to more importance, operating energy is seen asthe focus and embodied energy is nearly always ignored. Forthe fi rst time, a large sample of buildings has been assembledand analysed to improve the understanding of both energy andcost performance over their full life cycle. The aim of this paperis to determine the relationship between energy and cost usingregression analysis for a range of building functional types.The conclusion is that energy and cost are strongly correlated,independent of building area, and equations are presented forfuture modelling of energy using cost as the independent variable.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: melbourne; correlation; energy prediction; energy-cost relationship; optimisation
Index terms: case study, energy performance, independent variable, modelling, life cycle, embodied energy, cost performance, Australia
Subjects: energy systems, statistical analysis, analytical methods, Geography, value management, data collection methods, economics
Topics: Sustainability, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here