Vulnerability analysis of building structures to floods: The case of flooding informal settlements in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Kikwasi, G and Mbuya, E (2019) Vulnerability analysis of building structures to floods: The case of flooding informal settlements in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 37(5), pp. 629-656. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: There is evidence of increasing urban floods being aftermath of climate change. The purpose of this paper is to present findings-related analysis of vulnerability of building structures in informal settlements to floods and associated coping strategies. Design/methodology/approach: The study adopted a case study strategy, supported by field surveys and laboratory experiments. The informal settlement taken as case study is Sunna sub-ward. Field surveys involved interviews, questionnaires and observations and tests were conducted to determine the strength of walls, blocks and mortar. Findings: The findings reveal that vulnerability of building structures to floods are due to poor quality of materials used in construction of houses which are influenced by income levels, location (lower areas of Sunna sub-ward) and inadequate storm water drainage system. Moreover, socio-economic vulnerabilities do exist in the settlements and are related to lack of peace of mind, outbreak of disease and expenses related to repairing of flood affected houses. Coping strategies used in the sub-ward for built structures are building barrier walls at the front door of the house and use multiple strategies which are supported by reactive and recovery strategies. Research limitations/implications: The findings of this study were mostly affected by limited knowledge of respondents on construction materials and processes. Practical implications: Findings of the paper provide an insight on the effects of climate change on building structures in informal settlements and coping strategies in place to protect buildings. The outputs can be used for any other informal settlement in Dar es Salaam the only limitation is the terrain. Originality/value: The paper recommends use of quality building materials and technicians/artisans, improvement of surface water drainage and training of residents on the effects of climate change and variability. In addition, promising coping strategies should be adopted while those under-performing should be discouraged as they increase the cost burden among the urban poor.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; climate change; floods; informal settlements; Tanzania; vulnerability
Index terms: survey, experiment, strategy, flooding, surface water, interview, laboratory, climate change, drainage, urban poor, vulnerability, evidence, questionnaire, methodology, outbreak, case study, Tanzania, mortars (material), recovery, variability, Dar es Salaam, building material, income, construction material, informal settlement, coping
Subjects: community and social dimensions, climate science, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, economic analysis, operations management, building materials, Geography, management, health risk and incident analysis, research methods, infrastructure and transport systems, statistical analysis, environmental engineering, environmental hazards, behavioral psychology, housing and residential development, research management
Topics: Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here