Adaptive reuse of historical buildings: Service quality measurement of Kuala Lumpur museums

Md Ali, Z; Zawawi, R; Myeda, N E and Mohamad, N (2019) Adaptive reuse of historical buildings: Service quality measurement of Kuala Lumpur museums. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 37(1), pp. 54-68. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to focus on the impacts that the adaptive reuse of historical building has on museum service quality by analysing the visitors' expectations and perceptions through the HISTOQUAL model. It looks deeper into investigating the enhancement of adaptive reuse approach to historical buildings not only to the surrounding environment, but also to the building’s cultural significance. Design/methodology/approach: A field survey implementing quantitative approach was conducted by using questionnaires to collect the visitors' expectations and perceptions on their visits to the selected case study sites. The selected two case study sites are both newly adaptive reuse museums located in the heart of Kuala Lumpur. Through these case studies, the visitors' expectations and perceptions were analysed and the differences were identified. Findings: Positive feedback on the level of service quality provided at both museums indirectly shows the success of adaptive reuse initiative on the historical buildings towards adapting their new functions as a museum. It was also noted that foreign language leaflets and facilities for less able visitors were among the two service criteria that do not exceed the expectations of users. In general, these findings are crucial in identifying the gap within the services provided and appropriate measures that can be undertaken for further improvement. Research limitations/implications: Further study can be employed to a larger population of study to cater for a variety of perspectives from both users and managers of the buildings. Practical implications: This paper highlights the implications of users' feedback towards building usability and functions. It provided imperative findings from the users' point of view pertaining to the services provided. Social implications: The paper illustrates the significance of social perceptions on the implications of service delivery. It also reports empirical evidence in highlighting the importance of users' attributes towards excellent service delivery. Originality/value: Up to present, there exists a small number of studies that look into reviewing the new functions of adaptive reuse buildings. This study now contributes to create a larger number of studies in this scope, especially within the context of Malaysia.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptive reuse; histoqual; historical buildings; national heritage; service quality
Index terms: heart, level of service, Malaysia, service delivery, case study, adaptive reuse, cultural significance, population, methodology, service quality, questionnaire, evidence, historical building, manager, usability, survey
Subjects: practitioner, user-centered design, construction type, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, cross-cultural studies, demography, sustainable design, Geography, service delivery, research methods, performance measurement, medical science and clinical practice
Topics: International Construction, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here