Ahmad Shazali, A S and Tahar, K N (2020) Virtual 3D model of canseleri building via close-range photogrammetry implementation. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 38(1), pp. 217-227. ISSN 23984708
Abstract
Purpose: The current technique used to measure construction is the conventional total station method. However, the conventional method is time-consuming and could not be used to create a photo-realistic three-dimensional (3D) model of an object. Furthermore, the Canseleri building is located at a slope. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach: The aim of this study is to assess the geometric accuracy of a 3D model using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images. There are two objectives in this study. The first is to construct a 3D model of the Canseleri building using UAV images. The second objective is to validate the 3D model of the Canseleri building based on actual measurements. Findings: The close-range photogrammetry method, using the UAV platform, was able to produce a 3D building model. The results show that the errors between the actual measurement and the generated 3D model were less than 4 cm. The accuracy of the 3D model achieved in this study was about 0.015 m, compared to total station measurements. Originality/value: Accuracy assessment was done by comparing the estimated measurement of the 3D model with the direct measurement. The differences between the measured values with actual values could be compared. Based on this study, the 3D building model gave a reliable accuracy for specific applications.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | 3D model; accuracy; close-range photogrammetry; uav |
| Index terms: | slope, accuracy, methodology, 3D model, platform, implementation, unmanned aerial vehicle |
| Subjects: | computational design, contractual arrangements, automation and robotics, professional development, digital design, research methods, geotechnical engineering |
| Topics: | Procurement, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here