Herrera-Avellanosa, D; Haas, F; Leijonhufvud, G; Brostrom, T; Buda, A; Pracchi, V; Webb, A L; Hüttler, W and Troi, A (2020) Deep renovation of historic buildings: The iea-shc task 59 path towards the lowest possible energy demand and CO2 emissions. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 38(4), pp. 539-553. ISSN 23984708
Abstract
Purpose: Improving the energy performance of historic buildings has the potential to reduce carbon emissions while protecting built heritage through its continued use. However, implementing energy retrofits in these buildings faces social, economic, and technical barriers. The purpose of this conceptual paper is to present the approach of IEA-SHC Task 59 to address some of these barriers. Design/methodology/approach: Task 59 aims to achieve the lowest possible energy demand for historic buildings. This paper proposes a definition for this concept and identifies three key socio-technical barriers to achieving this goal: the decision-makers' lack of engagement in the renovation of historic buildings, a lack of support during the design process and limited access to proven retrofit solutions. Two methods – dissemination of best-practice and guidelines – are discussed in this paper as critical approaches for addressing the first two barriers. Findings: An assessment of existing databases indicates a lack of best-practice examples focused specifically on historic buildings and the need for tailored information describing these case studies. Similarly, an initial evaluation of guidelines highlighted the need for process-oriented guidance and its evaluation in practice. Originality/value: This paper provides a novel definition of lowest possible energy demand for historic buildings that is broadly applicable in both practice and research. Both best-practices and guidelines are intended to be widely disseminated throughout the field.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | best practice; energy retrofit; guideline; historic buildings; low energy |
| Index terms: | design process, historic building, face, methodology, dissemination, energy demand, built heritage, CO2 emissions, socio-technical, case study, low energy, carbon emission, database, renovation, best practice, energy performance |
| Subjects: | energy systems, psychology, design methods, climate science, air quality, business, construction type, data collection methods, heritage and conservation, data management, knowledge translation, research methods, renovation and retrofit |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here