Lynch, S and Proverbs, D G (2020) How adaption of historic listed buildings affords access. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 38(4), pp. 589-605. ISSN 23984708
Abstract
Purpose: Providing accessible and inclusive environments fulfils legislative obligations and creates financial benefits. Historic-listed buildings rely on heritage tourism for continued financial support. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how historic-listed buildings adapt to afford access to people with disabilities (PwD), through physical and non-physical interventions. Design/methodology/approach: Using a case study approach of an historic property, research comprises of: an observational visitor survey, determining visitor demographic regarding visible disabilities; an access audit, determining current accessibility; interviews with the property’s Access Team; and desktop-based research. Findings: The results depict the complexity, challenges and barriers in making historic buildings accessible for PwD. Through alternative training and inclusive initiatives, the findings reveal how historic buildings may support the multiplicity of individuals' access requirements. Research limitations/implications: Further research incorporating longer surveying periods, wider demographic of interviewees and multiple case study analysis would provide richer, comparable data in understanding the intrinsic complexities involved in creating accessibility within historic buildings. The implications of this research could transcend management, conservation and adaptation of listed buildings in identifying the defined barriers and solutions to overcome them. Originality/value: The originality of this paper relates to the use of alternative services creating access when physical changes are deemed “unreasonable”. A conceptual framework is developed depicting the complexity, challenges and barriers in making historic buildings accessible for PwD.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accessibility; building conservation; dementia; inclusion |
| Index terms: | surveying, interview, dementia, survey, historic building, tourism, methodology, access audit, disability, complexity, conceptual framework, case study, listed building, accessibility, adaptation, conservation |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, heritage and conservation, systems engineering, health conditions and diseases, theoretical framing, design practice, inclusive design, research methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, environmental policy, construction type, data collection methods, user focus |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here