Resolving deterioration of heritage building elements using an expert system

Marzouk, M; ElSharkawy, M; Elsayed, P and Eissa, A (2020) Resolving deterioration of heritage building elements using an expert system. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 38(5), pp. 721-735. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: The maintenance of original building materials is crucial to extending their lifetime and avoiding their repeated replacement in heritage buildings. In order to maintain the identity of built heritage and resolve possible deterioration over the years, special expertise is required to avoid possible materials decay and to preserve building elements in a way that allows them to function efficiently as originally intended. Design/methodology/approach: An expert system is created to identify the most effective method of repair for each specific building material and to propose the appropriate conservation methods for resolving different types of damages. Artificial intelligence is used to provide a systematic problem-solving technique that saves time and provides the most efficient conservation and preservation method for heritage building elements. Findings: Those expert systems could be generalized on similar historical structures to be used as a systematic guide for examining material, evaluating deterioration state and objectively suggesting their related repair techniques. Further deteriorated materials in heritage buildings should be investigated, such as stone and timber staircases, to provide a guide for usage by restoration and conservation authorities. Originality/value: Using a user-friendly method, with special considerations to three major problematic building elements in terms of decay and material dysfunction in heritage structures, timber doors, iron gates, and ceiling paintings are selected for diagnosis and repair in an Egyptian heritage building.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: deterioration; expert systems; heritage buildings; heritage maintenance; materials decay
Index terms: heritage building, expert system, methodology, replacement, restoration, repair, deterioration, damages, identity, building material, historical structure, artificial intelligence, conservation, built heritage
Subjects: renovation and retrofit, maintenance engineering, research methods, heritage and conservation, data management, sociology, materials science, dispute resolution, construction type, artificial intelligence, material degradation and durability, environmental policy, building materials
Topics: Sustainability, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here