O’Connell, S; Reynders, G; Seri, F; Sterling, R and Keane, M M (2020) A standardised flexibility assessment methodology for demand response. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 38(1), pp. 20-37. ISSN 23984708
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to standardised four-step flexibility assessment methodology for evaluating the available electrical load reduction or increase a building can provide in response to a signal from an aggregator or grid operator. Design/methodology/approach: The four steps in the methodology consist of Step 1: systems, loads, storage and generation identification; Step 2: flexibility characterisation; Step 3: scenario modelling; and Step 4: key performance indicator (KPI) label. Findings: A detailed case study for one building, validated through on-site experiments, verified the feasibility and accuracy of the approach. Research limitations/implications: The results were benchmarked against available demonstration studies but could benefit from the future development of standardised benchmarks. Practical implications: The ease of implementation enables building operators to quickly and cost effectively evaluate the flexibility of their building. By clearly defining the flexibility range, the KPI label enables contract negotiation between stakeholders for demand side services. It may also be applicable as a smart readiness indicator. Social implications: The novel KPI label has the capability to operationalise the concept of building flexibility to a wider spectrum of society, enabling smart grid demand response roll-out to residential and small commercial customers. Originality/value: This paper fulfils an identified need for an early stage flexibility assessment which explicitly includes source selection that can be implemented in an offline manner without the need for extensive real-time data acquisition, ICT platforms or additional metre and sensor installations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | demand response; demand side management; demonstration study; energy flexible buildings; smart grid; smart readiness indicator |
| Index terms: | society, experiment, accuracy, methodology, real-time data, demand-side management, demand response, key performance indicator, case study, platform, contract negotiation, acquisition, flexible building, implementation, modelling |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, business, energy systems, contractual arrangements, project delivery, analytical methods, professional development, digital design, contract management, demand management, building design, research methods, communities and social development, data management |
| Topics: | Supply Chain Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Contract Administration, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Business Strategy, Procurement, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here