An areal openness model (AOM) for quantifying the "openness" of floor plans

Rockow, Z R and Ross, B E (2020) An areal openness model (AOM) for quantifying the "openness" of floor plans. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 39(3), pp. 470-489. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to describe and demonstrate a quantitative areal openness model (AOM) for measuring the openness of floor plans. Creation of the model was motivated by the widely reported but rarely quantified link between openness and adaptability. Design/methodology/approach: The model calculates values for three indicators: openness score (OS), weighted OS (WOS) and openness potential (OP). OS measures the absence of obstructions (walls, chases, columns) that separate areas in a floor plan. WOS measures the number of obstructions while also accounting for the difficulty of removing them. OP measures the potential of a floor plan to become more open. Indicators were calculated for three demolished case study buildings and for three adapted buildings. The case study buildings were selected because openness – or lack thereof – contributed to the owners' decisions to demolish or adapt. Findings: Openness indicators were consistent with the real-world outcomes (adaptation or demolition) of the case study buildings. This encouraging result suggests that the proposed model is a reasonable approach for comparing the openness of floor plans and evaluating them for possible adaptation or demolition. Originality/value: The AOM is presented as a tool for facility managers to evaluate inventories of existing buildings, designers to compare alternative plan layouts and researchers to measure openness of case studies. It is intended to be sufficiently complex as to produce meaningful results, relatively simple to apply and readily modifiable to suit different situations. The model is the first to calculate floor plan openness within the context of adaptability.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptability; adaptation; demolition; floor plans; model; openness
Index terms: case study, inventory, designer, adaptation, owner, manager, column, adaptability, methodology, accounting
Subjects: economic analysis, profession, data collection methods, user focus, practitioner, sociology, structural engineering, research methods, inventory management
Topics: Supply Chain Management, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here