Galha, H M (1998) Quality in building design: A case study. In: Hughes, W (ed.) Proceedings of 14th Annual ARCOM Conference, 9-11 September 1998, Reading, UK.
Abstract
There is evidence that designers begin the design process with some presumptions about the potential users and their expectations. Therefore, a better understanding of how users perceive their physical environments is essential to provide the right framework for a more user-friendly design. This will provide the means to the effective control of client expectations from the earliest stages of the project. It is hypothesized that more effective user involvement in design leads not only to better adapted spaces, but also to more satisfied users. The aim is that by dealing with both expectations and design output, client satisfaction is more likely. In order to achieve the research aim, the case of classroom design is used as an example for data collection and analysis. An exploratory survey has been undertaken to understand the most important quality characteristics of a classroom, from the users' point of view. Data were collected from both staff and students. Repertory Grid method was used to elicit users' perceptions in nine classrooms. Data were input to Generalized Procrustes analysis to obtain a consensus map where the principal components are the important perceptual attributes. The results of the main study confirm the results of the previous survey.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building evaluation; quality design; repertory grid method; user perceptions |
| Index terms: | classroom, building evaluation, evidence, client satisfaction, designer, survey, building design, case study, design process |
| Subjects: | asset management, design methods, construction type, profession, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, client relations, architectural design |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here