Sustainable utilization of recycled aggregates: Robust construction and demolition waste reduction strategies

De Luca, A; Chen, L and Gharehbaghi, K (2021) Sustainable utilization of recycled aggregates: Robust construction and demolition waste reduction strategies. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 39(4), pp. 666-682. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: Due to the high demand of concrete, significant volume of natural resources is required, including virgin aggregates. Many studies have shown that the production of concrete has one of the highest CO2 levels. Although efforts are in place to recycle, enormous effects on landfill and the wider environment remain. Research has suggested the importance of reusing construction and demolition waste such as aggregate for use in recycled concrete. However, robust construction and demolition waste reduction strategies are required. There have been numerous researches on the use of recycled concrete and its management in the construction industry. This paper further consolidates this position. Design/methodology/approach: This paper exhibits the barriers and benefits of using recycled aggregates for construction industry. This is achieved via reviewing the current construction and demolition waste reduction strategies used mainly in three countries: the UK, Australia and Japan. These countries were selected since they seemingly have similar construction industry and environment. Subsequently, evolving barriers and benefits of using recycled aggregates for construction industry are also reviewed and discussed. And to support such focus, robust construction and demolition waste reduction strategies will be advocated. Findings: The findings are summarized as follows. The recycling construction and demolition waste could have a positive net benefit compared to the procurement and production of virgin aggregate materials with the same properties. This is not only financially beneficial but also environmentally viable, as fewer resources would be required to produce the same aggregate material. There are effective ways to achieve a high recycle rate target, as demonstrated by Japan. The implementation of a similar recycling process could be implemented globally to achieve a more effective recycle rate through the help of governments at all levels. By creating awareness about the financial and environmental benefits of using recycled aggregate products, large recycling companies can be also enticed to follow suit. Practical implications: The findings from this paper can ultimately support the construction industry to further consolidate and advocate the use of recycled aggregates. Originality/value: To achieve the research aim, this paper reviews some of the main sustainability factors of recycled aggregates (including coarse and fine aggregates) and provides comparison to virgin aggregates.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: demolition waste; material properties; recycled aggregates; recycled concrete; recycling process; sustainability
Index terms: construction industry, implementation, recycling, aggregate, Australia, natural resource, waste reduction strategy, demolition waste, recycled aggregate, landfill, methodology, fine aggregate, construction and demolition, Japan, recycle, material property
Subjects: waste management, materials science, contractual arrangements, environmental resource management, material properties and characteristics, health safety and environment, Geography, research methods, industry analysis
Topics: Procurement, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here