Effective management strategies for construction contract disputes

Amoah, C and Nkosazana, H (2022) Effective management strategies for construction contract disputes. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 41(6), pp. 70-84. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: Contract risk management has become a critical mission, as contract issues may lead to a loss of vast amounts of money to parties involved or cause project failure. This study sought to identify effective management strategies to mitigate construction contract issues that might emerge during construction. Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative research approach was adopted for the study. Structured questionnaires made up of close-ended questions were distributed to construction professionals in South Africa via the SurveyMonkey platform. The data were then analysed using descriptive statistics. Findings: The findings indicate that the critical sources of contract-related disputes are ambiguous definitions of the contract parties' scope of their rights and obligations, lack of precise arrangements regarding the calculation of contractual penalties for failure to meet the deadline, lack of detailed specification of the works and specific milestones, lack of provisions regulating changes to the project documentation during the construction stage, an excessive amount of contractual penalties on contractor's side and lack of provisions regarding the rules of performing additional and replacement works and their settlement. However, for these disputes to be effectively managed, strategies such as reduction uncertainties in project's phases, setting up contingency plans, construction guarantee, extension of time claims, payment guarantee, retention and escalation clause should be implemented by the parties involved. Research limitations/implications: Even though the empirical study focused on construction professionals in South Africa, the findings could be applied to other countries outside of South Africa. Practical implications: To effectively manage and prevent contract disputes from averting project failures and losses to parties involved in the contract, construction professionals need to be aware of strategies that must be implemented before and during the project execution. If well implemented, these strategies will help a construction project be successful and experience fewer contractual disputes. Originality/value: The study has identified the knowledge gap concerning suitable contract risk management strategies available for implementation to effectively prevent any contract parties from losing money, time and project failure.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; contracts; disputes; project management; risk management
Index terms: dispute, management strategy, platform, project failure, quantitative research, retention, statistics, implementation, project management, construction professional, empirical study, construction contract, risk management, strategy, guarantee, specification, penalty, South Africa, replacement, construction project, methodology, questionnaire, contract risk management, project documentation
Subjects: management, contract structure, research methods, production management, contractual condition, Geography, professional development, project management theory and practice, contract management, digital design, regulatory law, data collection methods, risk assessment, contract type, mathematical modelling, project completion, materials science, dispute resolution, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, project planning
Topics: Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Risk Management, Procurement, Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here