Promoting continuous improvement in construction education: Developing curricula through graduate- practitioner reflection

Howarth, T and Griffith, A (1998) Promoting continuous improvement in construction education: Developing curricula through graduate- practitioner reflection. In: Hughes, W (ed.) Proceedings of 14th Annual ARCOM Conference, 9-11 September 1998, Reading, UK.

Abstract

Concern is frequently expressed by employers, amongst others, that degree courses in UK higher education institutions often give insufficient attention to the relevance of their curricula, and to key skills considered by employers to be important. In recognising the central importance of education and its considered management to the key resource of construction activity - people - this paper reports on a Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) funded research project. The project investigates and develops strategy for improving the relevance and responsiveness of teaching and learning to employment through partnership with graduates. This paper presents the rationale and methodology of the project and outlines an innovative curricula development mechanism . This mechanism provides for graduate reflection upon educational outcomes in light of professional experience, and enables curriculum development, formally and continually, to embrace professional needs. The adoption of this curricula mechanism at Sheffield Hallam University is seen as a positive strategy in enabling continuous improvement in undergraduate provision and is considered suitable for adoption by other higher education institutions.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: continuous improvement; curriculum development; education; reflection
Index terms: curriculum development, practitioner, methodology, undergraduate, construction education, reflection, continuous improvement, employment, construction activity, partnership, strategy, higher education institution
Subjects: construction operations, curriculum development, practitioner, professional education, educational institutions, partnership management, research methods, management, performance measurement, professional development
Topics: Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Site Management, Education, Human Resources, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here