Construction companies' compliance to personal protective equipment on junior staff in Nigeria: Issues and solutions

Ebekozien, A (2022) Construction companies' compliance to personal protective equipment on junior staff in Nigeria: Issues and solutions. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 40(4), pp. 481-498. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: The frequent occurrence of hazards, especially on junior staff in developing countries, is a major setback on project delivery. This is because the safety of the construction workers' environment influences their performance. Although a range of literature has addressed safety measures on construction sites, how far is their compliance with personal protective equipment (PPE) on junior staff is yet to receive in-depth studies in Nigeria. Therefore, this study investigated the level of Nigerian construction companies' compliance and proffered possible solutions that intend to improve the implementation of PPE on junior staff. Design/methodology/approach: The data were collected via observation and face-to-face interviews among the selected companies' staff in Lagos and Abuja. The interview is to determine their perceptions regarding compliance with PPE on construction sites. Findings: Findings show that compliance with PPE on junior staff, especially the indigenous construction companies, is poor. This is because monitoring and enforcement are lax by government regulatory agencies. Also, findings show that many international construction companies ensure that junior workers obey site safety measures those mitigate the chance of hazard occurrence during construction as a policy. Research limitations/implications: This paper data collection is limited to Abuja and Lagos, and a phenomenology type of qualitative research was employed, but this does not weaken the robustness. Future research is needed to consider adopting a mixed-methods approach. Practical implications: As part of this paper's implications, findings recommended that the construction company's safety regulations and policies should be robust and enriched to mitigate site-related hazards via a framework or mechanism, but the government agencies/ministries need to give the enabling direction, strict monitoring and enforcement of PPE on junior staff. This paper intends to stir up the appropriate government authorities for possibly passing the Labour, Safety, Health and Welfare Bill 2012 (updated in 2016) Act into law. Originality/value: This study demonstrates that the government agencies concern with approval and enforcement of construction site safety needs to reawaken to their responsibilities because of the lax implementation in many sites, especially in indigenous construction sites.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction organisation; low-income workers; Nigeria; possible solutions; safety precautions
Index terms: methodology, qualitative research, regulation, Abuja, approval, developing country, interview, compliance, government agency, construction site, face, regulatory agency, construction company, income, monitoring, Lagos, personal protective equipment, international construction, enforcement, construction worker, implementation, phenomenology, project delivery, construction organization, safety measures, Nigeria
Subjects: political science, administrative law, occupational health and safety management, development economics, methods and analysis, Geography, health safety and environment, research methods, project delivery, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, work location, psychology, practitioner, control systems, research design and methodology, organization, data collection methods, contractual role, strategic management
Topics: Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Procurement, Governance, Roles and Professions, International Construction, Legal Issues, Organizational Design, Site Management, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here