Built environment academics for 21st-century world of teaching: Stakeholders' perspective

Ebekozien, A; Aigbavboa, C and Aliu, J (2022) Built environment academics for 21st-century world of teaching: Stakeholders' perspective. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 41(6), pp. 119-138. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: Research reveals that the built environment graduates are not matching the needs of the 21st century construction industry. Evidence shows that the built environment academics (BEA) struggle to reskill and upskill to meet the industry's demand. Studies about Nigeria's BEA's perceived barriers in meeting the 21st-century industry demands are scarce. Thus, the paper investigated the perceived barriers and measures to improve BEA in Nigeria's 21st-century world of teaching. The outcome intends to enhance teaching practices and increase employability in the built environment disciplines. Design/methodology/approach: Data were sourced from elite virtual interviews across Nigeria. The participants were well informed about Nigeria's built environment education and the possible barriers hindering 21st-century teaching from improving employable graduates in the built environment professionals (BEP). The researchers adopted a thematic analysis for the collected data and supplemented the data with secondary sources. Findings: The study shows that BEA needs to improve BEA's teaching mechanism. Improving BEA will enable the built environment graduates to meet the minimum standards expected by the 21st-century industry. Findings categorised the perceived 22 barriers facing BEA into internal stakeholders-related barriers, external stakeholders-related barriers, and common barriers. Also, findings proffered practicable measures to improve BEA in the workplace via improved industry collaboration and technological advancement. Research limitations/implications: The research is restricted to the perceived barriers and measures to improve BEA in 21st-century teaching in Nigeria via a qualitative research design. Future research should validate the results and test the paper's proposed framework. Practical implications: The paper confirms that the BEA requires stakeholder collaboration and technological advancement measures to improve teaching in the 21st century, leading to enhanced employability graduates. The paper would stir major stakeholders, especially BEA, and advance the quality of employable graduates in the Nigerian built environment professions. Originality/value: The thematic network and proposed framework could be employed to stimulate Nigeria's BEA for better service delivery. This intends to create an enabling environment that will enhance stakeholders' collaboration and technological advancement for the BEA to produce better employable graduates in the 21st century.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: barriers; built environment academics; digital technology; Nigeria; stakeholders; teaching
Index terms: Nigeria, employability, service delivery, construction industry, profession, built environment, interview, external stakeholder, digital technology, methodology, qualitative research, collaboration, thematic analysis, built environment education, evidence
Subjects: research design and methodology, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, computing systems, institututions, sociology, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, human resources and leadership, research methods, management, professional development, service delivery, methods and analysis, Geography
Topics: Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Education, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here