Frimpong, E and Twumasi, E (2022) Prediction of unregulated energy usage in office buildings. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 40(2), pp. 269-282. ISSN 23984708
Abstract
Purpose: The paper presents a technique for predicting the energy consumption of unregulated energy loads (UELs) in office buildings. It also presents an approach for determining a set of optimum values required by the technique. Design/methodology/approach: The proposed technique uses the optimum power drawn and optimum usage period in three modes of device operation, for the prediction. The usage modes are active mode, idle (low active) mode and off mode. The optimum powers and usage times are inserted into a linear mathematical equation to predict the energy consumption. Regarding the approach for determining the optimum values, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) is applied to a range of values obtained from field measurements. The proposed prediction method and approach for determining optimum values were tested using data of energy consumption of UELs in a case study facility. Findings: Test results show that the method for predicting the energy consumption of UELs in offices is highly accurate and suitable for adoption by energy modelers, building designers and building regulatory agencies. The approach for determining the optimum values is also effective and can aid the establishment of workable benchmark values. Originality/value: A new and simple model has been developed for the prediction of unregulated energy. A method for determining a set of optimum values of power and usage periods required by the model has also been developed. Furthermore, optimum values have been suggested that can be fine-tuned for use as benchmark values. The proposed approaches are the first of their kind.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | energy; genetic algorithm; office building; prediction; unregulated energy load |
| Index terms: | methodology, genetic algorithm, prediction method, regulatory agency, energy consumption, case study, designer, office building, field-measurement |
| Subjects: | energy systems, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, construction type, profession, administrative law, algorithms, research methods |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here