Quality management framework for government social housing construction in South Africa

Amoah, C (2023) Quality management framework for government social housing construction in South Africa. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 41(6), pp. 217-236. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: In addressing the housing deficits for the less privileged citizens, the South African government began constructing social housing after coming to power in 1994. However, the construction of these houses is bedevilled with many issues; prominent among them are poor quality of the constructed houses. This study seeks to develop a quality management framework for achieving quality and efficiency in public-sector housing construction, a hallmark of the country's procurement goals. Design/methodology/approach: Telephone interviews were conducted with construction professionals involved in constructing government social houses across South Africa, chosen randomly. The data gathered were analysed using the content analysis method. Findings: The study found that the most significant cause of poor quality government-constructed social housing is multifaceted, categorised into project management-related, procurement-related, contractor-related, corruption-related and political-related. Practical implications: Failure to develop and implement a quality management framework on government-constructed social housing leads to poor quality social housing. Originality/value: The study has identified quality-related issues and has developed a Quality Management (QM) framework for the stakeholders involved in the construction of the houses to guide them in the project implementation process to ensure project success and quality standards.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: government; projects implementation; quality management; quality standard; social houses
Index terms: housing, South Africa, corruption, methodology, content analysis, interview, project management, quality management, social housing, implementation, residential construction, construction professional, quality standard, project success, efficiency
Subjects: quality assurance, professional ethics, housing and residential development, project management theory and practice, professional development, Geography, performance management, construction integration, research methods, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, construction type, data collection methods
Topics: Business Strategy, Information Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Procurement, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here