Condition assessment model of building indoor environment: A case study on educational buildings

Eweda, A; Al-Sakkaf, A; Zayed, T and Alkass, S (2023) Condition assessment model of building indoor environment: A case study on educational buildings. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 41(4), pp. 767-788. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop a condition assessment (CA) model for a building's indoor 21 environments and to improve the building's asset management process. Design/methodology/approach: The methodology is based on dividing the building into spaces, which are the principal evaluated elements based on the building's indoor environmental quality (IEQ). An evaluation scheme was prepared for the identified factors and the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) technique was used to calculate the relative weight of each space inside the building as well as the contribution of each IEQ factors (IEQFs) in the overall environmental condition of each space inside the building. The multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) was then applied to assess the environmental conditions of the building as a whole and its spaces. An educational building in Canada was evaluated using the developed model. Findings: Each space type was found to have its own IEQFs weights, which confirms the hypothesis that the importance and allocation of each IEQF are dependent on the function and tasks carried out in each space. A similar indoor environmental assessment score was calculated using the developed model and the building CA conducted by the facility management team; “89%” was calculated, using K-mean clustering, for the physical and environmental conditions. Originality/value: IEQ affects occupants' assessment of their quality of life (QOL). Despite the existence of IEQ evaluation models that correlate the building's IEQ and the occupants' perceived indoor assessments, some limitations have led to the necessity of developing a comprehensive model that integrates all factors and their sub-criteria in an assessment scheme that converts all the indoor environmental factors into objective metrics.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: analytical hierarchy process; building condition assessment; indoor environmental quality; inspections; multi attribute utility theory
Index terms: environmental factor, environmental assessment, environmental conditions, methodology, quality of life, asset management, educational building, analytical hierarchy process, clustering, indoor environmental quality, Canada, indoor environment, inspection, building condition, multi-attribute utility theory, case study
Subjects: research methods, public and environmental health, Geography, asset management, decision-making and optimization, quality assurance, environmental health, construction type, data collection methods, environmental impact, environmental science, data science
Topics: Sustainability, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here