Design quality assessment of campus facilities through post occupancy evaluation

Hassanain, M A; Sanni-Anibire, M O and Mahmoud, A S (2023) Design quality assessment of campus facilities through post occupancy evaluation. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 41(4), pp. 693-712. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to present the design quality assessment of facilities on a university campus in Saudi Arabia. Design/methodology/approach: Forty-nine standardized design quality indicators (DQIs) have been adopted for the study. These were classified into relevant categories including: “Indoor Environment, Safety and Maintenance,” “Furniture, Utilities and Spaces” and “Privacy, Appearance and Surrounding Areas.” A web-based survey was used to obtain responses from 207 respondents. The survey was designed based on a Likert scale of satisfaction and was analyzed to obtain the satisfaction indices (SI) as well as Design Quality Scores (DQS). Findings: Occupants were dissatisfied the “level of noise generated from within the space,” “amount of natural light from daylighting systems” and “ease of control of air ventilation systems” among others. The DQS revealed that residential buildings had the highest design quality in terms of “Indoor Environment, Safety, and Maintenance” and “Privacy, Appearance and Surrounding Areas.” Administrative buildings had the best design quality in terms of “furniture, utilities and spaces.” Academic buildings had the lowest design quality in terms of “Indoor Environment, Safety and Maintenance” and “Privacy, Appearance and Surrounding Areas.” Originality/value: Ultimately, the study demonstrated how the adoption of a standard set of DQIs could facilitate the standardization of design quality evaluation in the property sector as well as identify best practices through comparison and benchmarking.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: campus facility; design quality; facility benchmarking; post occupancy evaluation
Index terms: utilities, indoor environment, design quality indicator, post-occupancy evaluation, Saudi Arabia, satisfaction, residential building, best practice, standardization, survey, daylighting, ventilation, design quality, benchmarking, natural light, Likert scale, privacy, methodology
Subjects: Geography, research methods, performance measurement, professional ethics, building performance, business, air quality, data collection methods, construction type, project delivery, evaluation methods, professional practice, environmental science
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Quality Management, Design Practice, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here