Sustainability potential awareness among built environment stakeholders: Experience from Tanzania

Kongela, S M (2023) Sustainability potential awareness among built environment stakeholders: Experience from Tanzania. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 41(2), pp. 301-319. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: Sustainability in the built environment is rapidly gaining attention worldwide, although many developing countries have not accomplished much on the ground as many sustainability aspects still remain untreated. Despite their low greenhouse gas contributions to the globe, the high rate of construction activities that do not embrace sustainable practices in these countries pose challenges to the environment. Using the case of Tanzania, this study assesses the level of sustainability awareness among key stakeholders in the built environment. Design/methodology/approach: The study uses a mixed-method research approach where primary data was collected using a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews with key informants comprising engineers, architects, property managers, property owners, property users and academicians from institutions of higher learning. Findings: Results show that despite the potential for a sustainable built environment, there is a low level of awareness among key stakeholders. Whereas few architects, who were aware, admitted to have not incorporated sustainability aspects in their building design, other stakeholders did not have active roles in decision-making involving building construction projects. Compared to the rest, the awareness level of property users was the lowest. Lack of a specific policy or policy statement on sustainable building, high initial costs of sustainable building, few skilled professionals and lack of a broad choice of building materials are some of the factors accounting for the low level of sustainability adoption in the built environment. Originality/value: The significance of this study lies within the objective of showing awareness levels of sustainability aspects among key built environment stakeholders and policymakers, which is important in devising strategies for promoting sustainable construction practices.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: built environment; green building; sustainability; Tanzania
Index terms: green building, engineer, architect, sustainable practice, Tanzania, strategy, property owner, decision-making, low level, sustainable building, questionnaire, developing country, building material, sustainability aspect, construction activity, methodology, interview, building construction, accounting, sustainable construction practice, built environment, building design, manager, greenhouse gas
Subjects: practitioner, economic analysis, sociology, Geography, research methods, construction operations, building construction, decision analysis, sustainable practices, sustainability assessment, measurement and scaling, profession, architectural design, building materials, development economics, management, data collection methods, infrastructure and transport systems, sustainable construction, climate science, design practice
Topics: Design Practice, Research Practice, Site Management, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Urban Studies, International Construction, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here