Comparative case study research: An international analysis of nine home warranty schemes

Royal, S; Lehoux, N and Blanchet, P (2023) Comparative case study research: An international analysis of nine home warranty schemes. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 41(4), pp. 789-824. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: Construction defects in residential buildings are causing significant impacts both on consumers and the industry. As a consequence, several countries have established new home warranty schemes. However, designing a public policy for domestic building warranties can become a difficult task. In fact, many of these programs in the past have failed, collapsed or gone bankrupt. Therefore, the purpose of the current research is to provide a systematic comparative representation of various active programs internationally. Design/methodology/approach: The methodology relied on a multiple-case study research design. The case selection covered a total of nine jurisdictions with compulsory home warranty programs. Those included Japan, France, United Kingdom, three provinces in Canada (Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta), and three states in Australia (New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland). The study applied a data collection protocol to gather all the evidence in a replicable manner for each individual case. Subsequently, a cross-case analysis was conducted to identify similarities and variations between programs. Findings: The findings unveiled institutional practices that aimed to resolve, compensate, or rectify defects in residential constructions within these countries. The review mostly suggested that every home warranty program presents certain unique characteristics. At the end, this paper proposed an analytical illustration representing the diversification of components adopted by each jurisdiction. Originality/value: Nowadays, there is still not a consensus within the academic community on what is an optimal solution when conceiving a new home warranty program. Hence, the current study aims to fill this knowledge gap by presenting the plurality of methods employed by several countries. This paper seeks to help policy makers and industry leaders to improve their home warranty scheme based on awareness derived from observations and analyses of what has been accomplished elsewhere in the world.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: domestic building insurance; new home warranty; new-build housing; residential construction defects
Index terms: diversification, warranty, insurance, residential construction, research design, new-build housing, Victoria, Canada, Australia, residential building, case study, construction defect, public policy, program, variation, methodology, cross-case analysis, New South Wales, evidence, United Kingdom, Japan, Queensland, domestic building, jurisdiction, France
Subjects: market analysis, contractual condition, Geography, construction integration, software systems, research methods, performance measurement, economic development, regions and continents, economic analysis, legal systems, contract obligations, data analysis and analytics, public policy, research design and methodology, construction type, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods
Topics: Contract Administration, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Construction Technology, Governance, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here