Umeokafor, N; Okoro, C; Diugwu, I and Umar, T (2023) Design for safety in construction in Nigeria: A qualitative inquiry of the critical opportunities. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 41(2), pp. 476-494. ISSN 23984708
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the critical opportunities for design for safety (DFS), the potential statutory (and non-statutory) health and safety (H&S) responsibilities of designers including DFS and its workability in developing countries. Design/methodology/approach: Interviews were conducted among 28 multi-designers including Architects, Civil Engineers and Builders and the data was analysed thematically. Findings: The study revealed that the likelihood of designers, clients, etc. inclining to change because of the infancy stage of H&S in developing countries, making it “fallow” for H&S was a barrier. The opportunities for DFS include the willingness of designers to develop DFS skills and knowledge, which results in a welcoming attitude towards DFS. Further, the success recorded by professional bodies on other regulatory matters and designers' greater inclination to comply with DFS when professional bodies are involved in the regulatory process of DFS remain key opportunities for DFS. Practical implications: For statutory-backed DFS to achieve the objective at the optimum level, the role of professional bodies in the regulatory and sensitisation processes, geographic differences in DFS legislation enforcement, nuanced and strategic design and enforcement of any legislation that will support DFS should be taken into consideration. Social implications: A grassroots collaborative approach to developing and implementing DFS in the country and the exploitation of the zeal of designers to have DFS-related knowledge, is recommended. Originality/value: To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first study that examines the opportunities for DFS in developing countries when it is (or not) supported by statute and the need to advance the understanding of DFS in developing countries through qualitative enquiry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architects; civil engineers; design risk management; prevention through design; safe design; safety in design |
| Index terms: | designer, exploitation, Nigeria, prevention, enforcement, architect, civil engineer, builder, health and safety, workability, developing country, legislation, interview, design risk, methodology, design for safety, statute |
| Subjects: | financial risk, development economics, Geography, health safety and environment, research methods, management, practitioner, design methods, profession, data collection methods, legal systems |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Legal Issues, Design Practice, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here