Van Den Bossche, N; Blommaert, A and Daniotti, B (2023) The impact of demographical, geographical and climatological factors on building defects in Belgium. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 41(3), pp. 549-573. ISSN 23984708
Abstract
Purpose: Quality failures in the design and construction process can entail significant delays and costs. Databases of building defects have proven to be useful for drawing conclusions on underlying causes of building defects and for identifying potential improvement actions to reduce the occurrence of building defects. Design/methodology/approach: The database comprising 27,074 cases from a Belgian insurance company was studied, and it was found that moisture problems account for 48% of all building defects, and stability problems 23%. To better analyse the geographical variability, the data were enriched with demographical, geographical and climatological factors of the municipality the concerned buildings were located in. This combined information was used to determine underlying external factors that impact the probability that specific types of building defects occur. Findings: The analysis of the data shows that external factors do indeed have a statistically significant impact. The factor with the highest impact is the number of walls the building has in common with its neighbours. The most significant climatological factor is the wind speed. Originality/value: A better understanding of the frequency of building defects and factors that contribute to the likelihood are important variables to consider in quality control and prevention.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building defects; factor method; pathology; statistical analysis |
| Index terms: | insurance, design and construction, quality control, prevention, variability, pathology, statistical analysis, database, methodology, municipality, building defect, wind speed, drawing, Belgium, stability |
| Subjects: | technical documentation, economic analysis, project delivery, environmental science, contractual arrangements, data science, professional practice, research methods, structural engineering, medical science and clinical practice, financial risk, Geography, data management, statistical analysis, administrative law |
| Topics: | Procurement, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here