Van Tam, N; Quoc Toan, N; Phong, V V and Durdyev, S (2023) Impact of BIM-related factors affecting construction project performance. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 41(2), pp. 454-475. ISSN 23984708
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the impact of primary building information modelling (BIM)-related factors, extracted from the literature on the subject, on construction project performance. Design/methodology/approach: Based on data collected from 134 BIM users, this study used structural equation modelling to assess the impact of these factors in five main BIM-related factor clusters. Findings: The results of the analysis confirmed the reliability and validity of the research design and outcomes. The findings indicated that the BIM-related external factors cluster is the most influential cluster affecting construction project performance. BIM-related project factors and BIM-related technological factors also had a significant impact on project performance. These were followed by the BIM-related management factors cluster, while the BIM-related human factors cluster had a low impact on project performance. Research limitations/implications: This study will contribute to fostering BIM adoption and implementation in the construction industry in developing countries. Originality/value: This study has filled a crucial knowledge gap by providing information on manageable primary BIM-related factors affecting construction project performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | BIM; construction project performance; SEM; Vietnam |
| Index terms: | project performance, implementation, construction industry, building information modelling, validity, research design, construction project, methodology, human factor, developing country, Vietnam, structural equation modelling |
| Subjects: | production management, Geography, development economics, project management theory and practice, research methods, industry analysis, information systems, statistical analysis, occupational health and safety management, evaluation and assessment methods, research design and methodology, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Health and Safety, Procurement, International Construction, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here