Role of leadership in transforming the profession of quantity surveying

Ofori, G and Toor, S-u-R (2009) Role of leadership in transforming the profession of quantity surveying. Construction Economics and Building, 9(1), pp. 37-44. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

The construction industry is facing a period of change. The roles ofthe professions involved in the industry in general, and of quantitysurveyors in particular, are also changing. There are opportunitiesfor surveyors to seize the initiative to broaden their involvement inprojects, and attain strategic positions within the industry. However,they will have to improve upon their skill sets and their knowledgebases. Senior quantity surveyors interviewed in Singapore sharedtheir views on the challenges facing the construction industry,and their profession. They suggested that the quantity surveyingprofession would only be able to address the pressing issues itfaces if it pays more attention to innovation and the development ofits people. It should be able to attract and retain talent. Knowledgemanagement will be of critical importance. This will be enabled andfacilitated by knowledge leadership.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Singapore; challenges; knowledge leadership; knowledge management; quantity surveying
Index terms: surveying, Singapore, profession, quantity surveying, knowledge management, construction industry
Subjects: institututions, professional development, Geography, profession, health monitoring assessment and metrics, industry analysis
Topics: Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here